Cleared the same day where we can. And under a block built on amalgamated lots, we put a camera down rather than trusting a plan that was never going to show all of it.
Online Now!·--:--
Lane Cove's flat boom is precisely dated. The first block went up in 1962, and by 1979 close to 200 of them lined the main roads around the village.
Each one stands across three or four of the old house lots. Those lots already had drainage, stormwater and service runs threading across them, laid for detached houses that were themselves not new.
When the block was built, some of that was reused because a workable connection was cheaper than a new one, some was abandoned exactly where it lay, and some was simply built over. Almost none of it generated a record.
So the useful first step under a building like this is not a diagram, it is footage. It is the difference between a targeted repair and an exploratory one, and it is a spend that only has to happen once.


Then something about that section is not what the plan says it is. Twenty minutes of footage will usually explain the whole thing.
The first block of flats went up in 1962, and by 1979 nearly 200 blocks lined the main roads around the village.
Each stands across three or four of the old house lots, replacing detached houses and bush. That is the ground the building sits on.
Where a house connection already existed in a workable position, reusing it was cheaper than making a new one.
So a 1968 building can discharge into pipework laid decades earlier, and the age of the block tells you almost nothing about it.
Amalgamating lots and building over them produced no tidy set of as-builts, and abandoned runs were rarely recorded at all.
Which is why a plan can be perfectly accurate about the new work and silent about half of what is down there.
A bend sited for a cottage that stood there in 1955 makes little sense under the building above it now.
Those shapes are where material collects, and they are exactly what the newer plan will not show.
House-era stormwater was laid for houses that no longer exist, and some of it still takes water.
When a blockage does not behave the way a sewer blockage should, that is frequently the reason.
Fixed price agreed before anyone starts. These are indicative 2026 ranges. On a building nobody has a reliable plan for, mapping it once is the spend that stops the rest recurring.
Through an existing access point, cleared and flow tested before we leave.
Footage handed over, with what we find marked and located.
Roots and hardened build-up in aged pipework take longer than a soft blockage.
What is actually down there, recorded once, for a building that has never had it done.
What the line is, where it runs, and which parts predate the building.

One unit or several. That single answer places the fault on the branch or on the common line before we arrive.

Through the existing access point, then run properly to confirm it is genuinely clear rather than simply moving again.

Standard on any repeat, and worth it on a first call under a block that has never been filmed.

Along with a written note of what is there and which parts look older than the building above them.
We will get it running today. And if this keeps happening in the same spot, we will show you what is actually down there rather than booking you in again.
Call 1300 381 569
Because on a building that sits across amalgamated house lots the plan generally shows what was installed for the block, not what was already in the ground when it went up. Those lots carried three or four houses' worth of drainage and stormwater. Some was reused, some was abandoned where it lay, and very little of it was drawn. Footage shows what is genuinely there rather than what somebody intended in 1968.
Because a workable connection that already existed was cheaper to reuse than to create a new one. That was ordinary practice and there is nothing wrong with it, but it means the age of the building tells you very little about the age of what it discharges into. We have opened plenty of lines under 1970s blocks that plainly predate them.
Frequently because it was not sited for the building above it. A bend or junction that makes no sense for a 1968 walk-up can make perfect sense for a cottage that stood on that spot in 1955. Those legacy shapes are where things catch, and they are also exactly what a plan drawn for the new building will not show you.
That the fault is downstream of all of them, on the shared side rather than in anybody's fixture. One unit slow is a branch problem. Several at once means the common line, and on this housing that is where the inherited pipework usually is.
More often than people expect here. House-era stormwater was laid for cottages that no longer exist, and some of those runs are still quietly taking water under a building that was designed around a different arrangement. When a blockage does not behave like a sewer blockage, that is frequently why.
Rarely, and on older pipework they do harm. They sit on top of the obstruction rather than passing through, they generate heat, and in aged pipe they attack the line about as readily as the blockage. If somebody has already poured one down, tell us when you ring rather than after we have opened it.
A standard clear through an existing access point is $150 to $400. A camera inspection is $250 to $450 with the footage handed over. Jetting a stubborn line is $400 to $700. Mapping what is actually under a block, which is the one worth doing once properly, is $450 to $900 depending on the size of the building.
Tell us how many homes are affected and whether it has happened before. Those two answers narrow it down faster than anything else.
Fixed price agreed first, footage handed over, and a straight account of what is under the building rather than what a plan claims.
Online Now!·--:--